Accumulated Total Postharvest Rating of Clones

    WA ID OR 3 State av.
    Rating     Rating     Rating     Rating
  Clone Total § Discard §§   Total § Discard §§   Total § Discard §§   Total
                       
1 Ranger Russet 32.4     32.6     22.6     29.2
2 Russet Burbank 27.9     18.6 Sp. Gr.   11.7 Sp. Gr.   19.4
3 A96814-65LB 32.4     32.1     34.4     33.0
4 A97066-42LB 27.0     31.9     21.8     26.9
5 A98345-1 35.5     35.9     25.2     32.2
6 A0008-1TE 27.3     27.7     21.1 Sp. Gr.   25.4
7 AC99375-1RU 33.1     36.6     35.3     35.0
8 AO96305-3 34.4     35.9     36.8     35.7
9 AO96365-2 27.4     32.6     16.1 Sp. Gr.   25.4
10 CO97087-2RU 35.3     31.9     30.3     32.5
11 CO98067-7RU 18.4 Sp. Gr.   21.0 Sp. Gr.   14.3     17.9
12 CO99053-3RU 28.8     33.3     15.6     25.9
13 CO99053-4RU 22.2 Sp. Gr.   34.5     16.5     24.4
14 CO99100-1RU 21.2 Sp. Gr.   28.5     14.9 Sp. Gr.   21.5
15 PA00N14-2 23.4     32.3     23.3     26.3
16 PA99N2-1 30.0     28.2     29.1     29.1
17 PA99N82-4 30.4     31.7     26.7     29.6
  Average 28.7     30.9     23.3      
§ maximum rating possible = 38                  
§§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level.          
Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank.
                       
  Clone WA   ID   OR   Average
                       
1 Ranger Russet H   H   H   H
3 A96814-65LB H   H   H   H
4 A97066-42LB L   H   H   H
5 A98345-1 H   H   H   H
6 A0008-1TE L   H   H   H
7 AC99375-1RU H   H   H   H
8 AO96305-3 H   H   H   H
9 AO96365-2 L   H   H   H
10 CO97087-2RU H   H   H   H
11 CO98067-7RU L   H   H   L
12 CO99053-3RU H   H   H   H
13 CO99053-4RU L   H   H   H
14 CO99100-1RU L   H   H   H
15 PA00N14-2 L   H   H   H
16 PA99N2-1 L   H   H   H
17 PA99N82-4 L   H   H   H
H = Higher than Russet Burbank, L = Lower than Russet Burbank, S = Same as Russet Burbank