|
|
|
WA |
ID |
OR |
3 State av. |
|
|
|
Rating |
|
|
Rating |
|
|
Rating |
|
|
Rating |
|
|
Clone |
Total § |
Discard §§ |
|
Total § |
Discard §§ |
|
Total § |
Discard §§ |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ranger Russet |
32.6 |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
88.1 |
|
2 |
Russet Burbank |
28.5 |
|
|
15.7 |
Sp. Gr. |
|
11.9 |
Sp. Gr. |
|
56.1 |
|
3 |
A00324-1 |
32.5 |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
73.8 |
|
4 |
A00727-1 |
19.2 |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
14.2 |
Sp. Gr. |
|
51.0 |
|
5 |
A01010-1 |
31.4 |
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
18.5 |
Sp. Gr. |
|
78.3 |
|
6 |
AO00057-2 |
35.9 |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
94.8 |
|
7 |
AO02183-2 |
27.6 |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
Average |
29.7 |
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
77.5 |
|
§ maximum rating possible = 38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clone |
WA |
|
ID |
|
OR |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ranger Russet |
H |
|
H |
|
H |
|
H |
|
3 |
A00324-1 |
H |
|
H |
|
H |
|
H |
|
4 |
A00727-1 |
L |
|
H |
|
H |
|
L |
|
5 |
A01010-1 |
H |
|
H |
|
H |
|
H |
|
6 |
AO00057-2 |
H |
|
H |
|
H |
|
H |
|
7 |
AO02183-2 |
L |
|
H |
|
H |
|
H |
H = Higher than Russet Burbank,
S = Same as Russet Burbank,
L = Lower than Russet Burbank