| Grading
It is self-evidently
paramount that you produce your own work containing your own thoughts.
Please see the WSU Academic Integrity
statement and my comments.
This class is structured
around actively discussing the texts of our course - in class and
in papers. There will be five short writings, and one presentation
in class (see the numbered topics).
The writings and the presentation will be graded according to the
sophistication with which they deal with their topics: the thoroughness
of analysis, the scope of thought, and the meticulousness of their
composition. (Suggested length of each paper: 4 pages typed, double-spaced.)
Keep all writings and your presentation hand-out in a portfolio
(a slim, soft-sided folder with inside pockets.) A hand-out displaying
the structure and content of the presentation is required.
A comparative approach
is appreciated relating the text in focus to other texts, or aspects
of the course, or modern life as we know it.
Final grade will be assessed
according to the final
grade grid, and will be determined by:
(1)
5 ESSAYS [50%]
(2) ONE IN-CLASS PRESENTATION [20%]
(3) ACTIVE PARTICIPATION [30%]
Re. (1): Each of the FIVE ESSAYS
(4 pages each) should be considered a critical contemplation and
discussion of the texts involved. I will look for the following
elements when evaluating your writings:
- Analytical
precision. Consult the critical
thinking guidelines for information about structure and suggestions
for areas of analytical inquiry. The Final
Grade Grid also outlines overall productive dimensions of
writing.
- Insightful,
creative thinking. Create connections between various
characters and elements in your interpretation of the text (or
texts), and/or between your interpretation of the text and e.g.
comporable elements in our contemporary world.
- Research.
Sometimes a scholarly opinion may be just what is needed to provide
a fruitful perspective to discussion, analysis, or interpretation!
Or, researching a historical background to something creates great
context for interpretation and understanding. Even in limited
measure researching such perspectives will strengthen your paper.
- Fluent, expressive
language,
and a coherent structure, will be rewarded. (See
critical thinking guidelines)
This rubric provides
detailed evaluative criteria for critical thinking and writing:
Guide
to Rating Integrative & Critical Thinking
Taken as a whole
this rubric outlines a very ambitious level of 'mastery.'
Do not let it scare you! Use the
rubric's parameters for self-evaluation of different sections
of your writings.
|
Please do not hesistate
to contact me if you have questions or concerns about any of these
points! (Honors Hall 130D; 335-7694; kimander@wsu.edu)
Essay
#1 due Monday 1.29
Essay #2 due Tuesday 2.20
Essay #3 due Friday 3.9
Essay #4 due Monday 4.9
Essay #5 due Monday 4.30
(Topics
will be provided)
Re. (2): THE
PRESENTATION is a 20 minute presentation of
a fictional saga-text or factual text. Sign up for one of the 14
numbered presentation topics. First come, first served! The presentation
includes a 1-2 page handout to all class participants detailing
the presentation. The handout should provide an overview of the
text and at least three questions for further discussion.
- Make sure you structure
your time well to present essential perspectives and points
while leaving enough time for questions and discussion. While
you should aim at presenting for approximately 20 minutes, it
is my expectation that you as the presenter are willing to entertain
questions from the audience, including myself, during the
presentation. I expect you to be able to defend your perspectives
while productively engaging other perspectives. In such case the
total time of the presentation most likely will stretch beyond
20 minutes, and your role in part becomes 'leader of the discussion.'
Resume your presentation when a question has been answered.
The presentation will
be graded according to the following criteria:
- Enthusiasm for your
role as presenter.
- Understanding
the text(s).
- Evidence of research
and independent, critical evaluation of the text(s).
- Willingness to pose
and answer questions.
- A well-structured
presentation including a 1-2 page hand-out accounting for all
facets of the presentation including three questions for further
discussion.
Re. (3): THE OPEN MIND-REQUIREMENT:
This seminar is requires lively discussion of the material. ACTIVE
PARTICIPATION in discussions strengthens the impression
of an engaged and well-prepared student! Consider this class an
excellent forum for exercising verbal skills! Two well-excused absences
(informed of in advance!) during the course of the semester will
be tolerated without ramifications for final grade. 'Ramifications'
may include writing a short make-up paper.
All writings (and the presentation hand-out) must be kept in a portfolio.
THE PORTFOLIO itself must be a slim,
soft-sided folder with inside pockets (color optional. Kindly write
your name on the front.) The portfolio must be turned in with both
the new and the “old” written assignments together for
comprehensive review. The completed portfolio containing all writings
is due Monday, April 30, 2007,
for final grade review.
_______________________________
|