For a much more extensive description than appears
on this brief page, see the works listed in the Selected
Bibliography on Puritanism.
|The term jeremiad refers to a sermon or
another work that accounts for the misfortunes of an era as a just penalty
for great social and moral evils, but holds out hope for changes that will
bring a happier future. It derives from the Old Testament prophet
Jeremiah, who in the seventh century B.C. attributed the calamities of
Israel to its abandonment of the covenant with Jehovah and its return to
pagan idolatry, denounced with "lurid and gloomy eloquence" its religious
and moral iniquities, and called on the people to repent and reform in
order that Jehovah might restore them to his favor and renew the ancient
The term has also been used more broadly, according to Emory Elliott: "Taking their texts from Jeremiah and Isaiah, these orations followed--and reinscribed--a rhetorical formula that included recalling the courage and piety of the founders, lamenting recent and present ills, and crying out for a return to the original conduct and zeal. In current scholarship, the term 'jeremiad' has expanded to include not only sermons but also other texts that rehearse the familiar tropes of the formula such as captivity narratives, letters, covenant renewals, as well as some histories and biographies" (Cambridge History of American Literature, Volume 1, 257).
According to Sacvan Bercovitch (The American Jeremiad) and Perry Miller (The New England Mind: From Colony to Province), the jeremiad could exhort to action and caution against headlong zeal. Although they created anxiety through a recitation of current woes, jeremiads also reassured listeners by evoking the spirit of a glorious past and suggesting that the same spirit, now slumbering but able to be awakened, existed in the present day. According to Miller, one technical problem is that the jeremiad "could make sense out of existence as long as adversity was to be overcome, but in the moment of victory it was confused" (33).
|The structure of the jeremiad was prescribed
by the theory of external covenant. (For other types of sermons, see the
Structure page and its links.)
1. Doctrine (text taken from Bible, especially Isaiah or Jeremiah):
a. Some proposition that people are pursued for their sins.2. Reasons or Explication: Exposition of the national covenant
a. terms3. Applications or uses
a. Provocations to vengeance
Election sermons and jeremiads (from Emory
a. Review of biblical events that foreshadowed the text2. Doctrine: Announcement of general laws and lessons
a. Propositions3. Applications and Uses
Describes how Doctrine and Proposition pertained to contemporary New England4. Addresses the various groups in the audience (governor, elected officials, etc.)
|The General Court in Massachusetts
opened in May of each year from 1634 on with an election sermon, a practice
that continued until 1834 with the exception of 1684-1691, when the sermons
were stopped to protest the revocation of the Massachusetts Bay Colony's
charter. By 1660-1690, many election day sermons had turned into
jeremiads, although they decreased in number at the end of the 1680s (Elliott)
|From Daniel Shea, Spiritual Autobiography
in Early America: "The spiritual autobiographer is primarily concerned
with the question of grace: whether or not the individual has been accepted
into divine life, an acceptance signified by psychological and moral changes
which the autobiographer comes to discern in his past experience" (xxvii).
According to Shea, "New England Puritans regularly stipulated a qualification for church membership . . . . Beyond the usual confession of faith, the applicant was required to give a satisfactory narrative of his experience of grace. these narratives hardly deserve to be considered autobiography . . . [subjects are reduced to] testifying that their experiences follow a certain pattern of feeling and behavior." The thematic pattern of the conversion narrative was to draw a distinction between easy self-righteousness and the new birth of saving grace.
Perry Miller tells us that William Chapel, Milton's tutor, listed only New England writers when recommending treatises on conversion to his students at Cambridge (Shea 91).
|According to Emory Elliott, Thomas Hooker (1586-1647)
"favored a more liberal membership policy [than his rival John Cotton],
and he devised an elaborate preparation process that involved precise psychological
stages on the way to conversion. The six essential stages of this
morphology of conversion were contrition, humiliation, vocation, implantation,
exaltation, and possession; and these he subdivided further.
He required that a prospective member demonstrate to him and then to the
congregation a successful passage through these stages" (Cambridge History
of American Literature, Vol. 1, 201).