George Dickie’s Art Theory: Autonomy with Regulation
Just as Aristotle and Plato attempted
to do two hundred fifty thousand years ago, George Dickie attempts to define
what art is. Years of art history and numerous other art theories influence
Dickie’s definition. Instead of presenting a purely philosophical explanation,
Dickie offers a structured breakdown of what the artworld consists of and
how art is accepted into this world. Under Dickie’s definition, many
pieces of art can be classified as so, when past theories would have disregarded
their status as art. Unrestricted modern movements in art are included in
Dickie’s unrestricted definition.
Recent art innovators, such as Marcel Duchamp and Juan Gris, are able to establish
a role in the artworld. Dickie’s definition, however, does not encompass
everything. It does contain boundaries. Examination of modern art, the BBC
television show “Faking It,” and the success of Thomas Kincade’s
art enterprise will illustrate the key points of Dickie’s theory.
Dickie does an effective job of outlining what the artworld is, who is a part
of the artworld, and how art can be classified. The artworld is defined as,
“the broad social institution in which works of art have their place”
(Dickie 21). Dickie considers the core of the artworld to be the artists,
presenters, and those who appreciate the artwork. Artist Marcel Duchamp echoes
the ideas of Dickie, “The creative act is not performed by the artist
alone; the spectator brings the work in contact with the external world by
deciphering and interpreting its inner qualifications and thus adds his contribution
to the creative act” (qtd. in “Marcel Duchamp”). Without
using the term, Duchamp perfectly explains Dickie’s idea of the artworld,
consisting of the artists and the audience. The artworld is an institution
consisting of systems that have their own unique origins and development.
Each system has qualifications that make it separate from other systems. Within
these systems are subsystems. Subsystems are more specific divisions that
allow for the expansion of the institution. Establishing the basic structure
of the artworld makes it easier to understand how objects can be classified
as art. To be classified as art, the object must be an artifact and be approved
by members acting on behalf of the artworld. To be approved the artwork in
question must act on behalf of an institution, be conferred of status, be
a candidate, and be appreciated (Dickie 23). Each step of classification can
become complex, but Dickie’s theory introduces a common scale on which
art can be measured. Dickie also limits his definition of art in a discussion
of art reproductions. In the established institution, “. . . originality
in paintings is an antecedent requirement for the conferring of the candidacy
for appreciation” (Dickie 30). Unoriginal art is not even considered
a candidate for art status.
Juan Gris and Marcel Duchamp, both modern artists, exemplify Dickie’s
concepts. Both men were part of innovative art movements that were expansions
on already existing art forms. Their new ideas and methods were incorporated
to already established divisions of the artworld. Juan Gris was a Spanish
painter and a leading artist in the cubism movement. Cubism is characterized
by the breaking up and reassembling of objects in abstract forms. Often times,
such paintings have no sense of depth and have multiple planes interacting
with each other (“Cubism”). Juan Gris’ Violin and Checkerboard
follows cubism protocol (Appendix A). Even though it was an innovative art
form, established sets of rules existed that cubism artists followed. In this
respect, a new subsystem was created within the painting system. Guidelines
now existed for what types of art can be categorized as cubist. Marcel Duchamp
was associated most with the dada artistic movement. Despite dada’s
label as “anti-art,” it still became a subsystem within the artworld.
Dada aimed to go against all that traditional art strove to achieve: aesthetics,
meaning, and appeal to the senses. Duchamp’s series of readymades demonstrated
the ideals of dada. Duchamp took ordinary, already made objects and presented
them as art. Bicycle Wheel is simply what the title suggests, a bicycle wheel
put on display as art (Appendix B). The bicycle wheel was turned upside down
and fasted to a stool (“Marcel Duchamp”). Duchamp succeeded in
taking out the aesthetic aspect of art and concentrated on the qualities of
normal objects. Just as cubism entered the artworld, so did dada. Duchamp’s
readymades were presented as dada art, were then discussed within the artworld,
and were acknowledged as art. Each of these steps is necessary in Dickie’s
artworld construct.
The BBC television show “Faking It” follows the course of a house
painter attempting to become an artist and convince members of the artworld
of his authenticity. “Faking It” highlights the roles of numerous
members within the artworld. The artist, presenter, and appreciating members
of the artworld were all represented. The house painter had no motivation
to become an artist other than for the purpose of the television program.
After three short days the man was convinced he could be an artist. He was
educated about art by established members of the artworld. He was allowed
to experiment with various techniques. In the end, pieces from his collection
were chosen for display. By convincing the art critics of his credibility,
he established himself in the artworld. His art was acting on behalf of an
institution and its status was conferred by people acting on behalf of the
artworld. The fabricated set-up of the television show was entertaining, but
also displayed the process that occurs when classifying art.
Thomas Kincade, the proclaimed painter of light, is a modern artist whose
high levels of reproduction disqualify these works from being considered art.
By commercializing his images, Kincade is exploiting the success of his artwork
and decreasing its overall value. Dickie believes reproductions can never
become candidates for appreciation and can therefore never become part of
the artworld.
Despite the perceived independence that exists in Dickie’s art theory,
there are restrictions that effectively classify art as part of the artworld
or excluded from the artworld. By defining the artworld and its members and
establishing an updated model to classify art, Dickie creates an artworld
that consists of existing art genres and allows for future developments of
art.
==========================================
Appendix A
Violin and Checkerboard, 1913, by Juan Gris (“Juan Gris”)
Appendix B
Bicycle Wheel, 1913, by Marcel Duchamp (“Duchamp's Bicycle Wheel")
Works Cited
“Cubism.” wikepedia.com. 29 October 2006. < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism>.
Dickie, George. “What is Art?” Culture and Art: An Anthology. Ed.
by Lars Aagaard-Mogeusen. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1976.
“Duchamp's Bicycle Wheel." Visual Art Portal. 29 October 2006. <http://art.rutgers.edu/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=17>.
“Juan Gris.” wikepedia.com. 29 October 2006. < http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Juan_Gris>.
“Marcel Duchamp.” wikepedia.com. 29 October 2006. < http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Marcel_Duchamp>.
=================================
Cassie Malecha
Expected Graduation Date:
May 2007
Major: Biology, Pre-Physical
Therapy
Hometown: Prosser,
WA
George Dickie's art theory is particuarly
interesting to me because it establishes an unrestricted definition of what
art it. His ideas go beyond a purely philosphical explanation, and attempt to
break down what the artworld consists of. This is a difficult task, but Dickie
is able to explain the artworld in an understandable way. The title of the paper
"George Dickie's Art Theory: Autonomy with Regulation" is exactly
how I view his ideas. Great independence exists in Dickie's theory, but the
restrictions that Dickie imposes classify art as a part of the artworld or excluded
from the artworld. Compared to the other philosophers who have been discussed
in class, Dickie has the most relevance in modern art.